Arch. Myriam B. Mahiques Curriculum Vitae

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Cartoons in Park Avenue, NY

A rendering of "White Ghost" by Yoshitomo Nara on Park Avenue. The artist will be at the Park Avenue Armory. Picture by Andrea Rojas, posted at NYTimes on line.
The cutesy yet devilish cartoon characters created by the Japanese neo-Pop artist Yoshitomo Nara will soon be familiar sights on the Upper East Side landscape. On Aug. 29 a pair of whimsical, 12-foot-high fiberglass dogs will stand guard like 21st-century Komainu, those mythical lionlike statues commonly placed at the entrance to Japanese shrines to ward off evil spirits.
Organized by the nonprofit Art Production Fund, which presents art around the city, the outdoor installations — one across from the entrance to the Asia Society at 725 Park Avenue, at 70th Street, and the other at 67th Street and Park Avenue just in front of the Park Avenue Armory — will give New Yorkers a hint of a much larger initiative. The Asia Society is presenting a major retrospective of the artist’s work, “Yoshitomo Nara: Nobody’s Fool,” from Sept. 9 through Jan. 2. It will be the first time the entire museum will be filled with the work of just one artist and will include more than 100 works — drawings, paintings, sculptures, record album covers and large installations — that span the 50-year-old Mr. Nara’s career.
But before the retrospective opens, the public will have a chance to see him in action. For three hours daily from Aug. 23 through 27, Mr. Nara will stage his version of an artist’s studio inside the cavernous Drill Hall of the Park Avenue Armory. Visitors can watch him and Hideki Toyoshima, his longtime collaborator on installation designs and a founding member of the Japanese design collective “graf,” as they create special structures that resemble an artist’s studio, a stage and a carnival tent. And with the help of assistants from Japan — working as a team with the artists called YNG — the two will make new drawings and a large-scale billboard painting. Both the structures and the artworks will eventually be moved to the Asia Society as part of the retrospective.
And since the museum is hoping for a particularly young audience, it has also teamed up with students from Hunter College, which is nearby, who will help at the armory and blog about the project on the museum’s Web site. The Asia Society is also developing a special iPhone app for the show that will include exhibition highlights; images from the show linked to related music clips; photographs of past installations in various cities; and an English translation of tweets from narabot, the artist’s Twitter name.
REFERENCE
Cartoons Are Invading the Upper East Side. Article by Carol Vogel, for the New York Times.

Art and morality. A reflection by Arnold Toynbee

Great Pyramid of Egypt. Picture from revelationsofthebible.com
¨When we admire aesthetically the marvellous masonry and architecture of the Great Pyramid or the exquisite furniture and jewellery of Tut-ankh-Amen´s tomb, there is a conflict in our hearts between our pride and pleasure in such triumphs of human art and our moral condemnation of the human price at which these triumphs have been bought: the hard labour unjustly imposed on the many to produce the fine flowers of civilisation for the exclusive enjoyment of a few who reap where they have not sown. During these last five or six thousand years, the masters of the civilisations have robbed their slaves of their share in the fruits of society´s corporate labours as cold-bloodedly as we rob our bees of their honey. The moral ugliness of the unjust acts marks the aesthetic beauty of the artistic results.¨
Arnold Toynbee, Civilisation on Trial. P. 26

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Winner and Selected Works from the Cocktail Napkin Sketch Contest

After being deluged with 1,322 cocktail napkins bearing sketches from 352 architects and architecture students, ARCHITECTURAL RECORD’s jury of editors has determined the winner of its first annual Cocktail Napkin Sketch Contest.
The jury picked as “the best in show” a drawing of a gate from a Japanese garden by Truc Dang Manh Nguyen, an architect from Piedmont, California. The winner has practiced for 27 years and recently opened his own office. He prefers sketching to photographing buildings. “It forces the eye to focus and the mind to work,” he says, “and it’s easier to commit a work of architecture to memory through drawing.” Nguyen found the small size of the 5-inch-square cocktail napkin to be challenging, and confesses that this is the first time he actually tried to sketch on a cocktail napkin.
The jury awarded cocktail napkin sketches that reflect the spontaneous act of creativity underlyling this ephemeral art form. While a number of entrants treated the cocktail napkin sketch as an exercise in more time-consuming rendering, the jurors admired the artistry of these exercises and included several runners-up that belong to this category.
In addition to the winner and six runners-up, the RECORD editors selected additional sketches notable for their drawing techniques.
And finally, these entries caught the editors’ eyes for approaching the contest in ways that were either innovative—or out-and-out bizarre
REFERENCE
http://archrecord.construction.com/features/cocktail_napkin_sketch_contest/

Interview to Thomas Heatherwick, the Seed Cathedral´s creator

The Seed Cathedral representing the United Kingdom, has been the most impressive building in the great Expo Shangai. Here, I reproduce an interview by Edward Lifson to Thomas Heatherwick, its creator from Heatherwick Studio, London. Published in metropolismag.com, August 9th 2010. Photos by Edward Lifson:
Tell me about the project brief—what did the British government want from its pavilion?
We were very conscious of the context in which it was going to sit—the world’s largest-ever Expo. But the brief from the government asked for a building that showed that the U.K. is a good place to live and work, has good governance, and is multicultural and diverse and sustainable. So you’re going slightly numb reading that brief, because you know that that’s exactly the same brief that every other designer of every other pavilion has been given. And the British government added,  ‘And get voted one of the top ten pavilions!’ We felt that if we just did a cheesy advert for Britain, with clichés, we would not achieve that goal. The only way we would be noticed is by being slightly oblique.
We argued very strongly to the British government that instead of trying to say everything about Britain, we needed to try to say one thing well. The Expo theme, ‘Better City, Better Life,’ sounds catchy, sounds maybe too cute? But in a way it’s very serious. What’s the future of cities? What more serious question is there? We felt that we must respond to that. And something that the United Kingdom did pioneer is the integration of nature into cities. The world’s greenest city of its size in the world is actually London. The sheer quantity of parks, private gardens, public squares, private squares—and then we found that the world’s first botanical institution was in the U.K. And arguably one of the first public parks in modern times was in Britain.
So how did that idea about green cities lead to this design?
We tried to find something that would symbolize nature in the city as a starting point for the design. And we found that the Royal Botanical Gardens at Kew have a project to collect and preserve twenty-five percent of all the world’s plant species. We found that many people knew of this in Britain, but no one had actually seen it. The seeds aren’t there to see! We’re used to thinking that seeds are insignificant. So we felt that there’s a symbolic role that the seed could play, having to do with potential. And so we made one simple move. We trapped sixty thousand seeds in the ends of optical tubes that are seven and half meters long.
 What messages does your pavilion send to the Chinese visitors?
One message is that Britain is more than ‘bobbies’ and Big Ben. It’s a magnet for creative people. Many of the most brilliant have chosen to locate in Britain and London in particular. It’s just amazing what’s there. And so the pavilion is there to reflect that and try to change what people think a pavilion might be.
And we didn’t want a building and then a separate design for the exhibits inside. We set ourselves a task to make the building be the contents and make the contents be the building.
So many of the pavilions here are razzle-dazzle—they wow you. And so many of the towers booming in Chinese cities also flash lights and change colors and so forth. Is your pavilion a statement of resistance to that trend in place-making?
At this Expo, in a sea of stimulation, we thought that calmness would actually be the thing that would refresh you and that you might be the most thirsty for.
Then is your ‘Seed Cathedral’ a place of contemplation in which a Chinese visitor could regain their self and remember who they are, in this society speeding ahead at breakneck speed?
We don’t want to preach or patronize. We wanted a place you could interpret in many ways. You might find it technically interesting, or decorative in some way, or anything else. We give it no obvious interpretation.
We called it the ‘Seed Cathedral.’ I fought for that name. ‘Cathedral’ is not meant to imply any religious connotation. It is to evoke an architectural quality of space which is grand.  Maybe grandiose even.
The great Gothic cathedrals with pointed arches are based on trees leaning together. You take it even farther back—to the seed.
And the daylight coming through the tubes and the seeds is slightly like stained glass. It’s quite nice. I didn’t know that that would happen! But we were deliberately playing with the contrast between grandiosity and insignificance, bundling these things together. In a way, the power of the potential in those sixty thousand seeds is mind-blowingly massive. And you’re standing in the middle of the most bio-diverse point you could possibly stand in, in Shanghai! Everything is there, and yet there’s a kind of absence, it’s totally calm. We have even had people say, ‘Where is it? There’s nothing here!’
Have you been to the U.S. pavilion?
Yes.
What do you think of it?
The U.S. pavilion was clearly a last-minute operation. It was clearly done fast. And I think you can tell that it was done fast.
I know potential Chinese clients have come to you since this pavilion opened, and Her Majesty’s Consul General in Shanghai says Chinese visa applications to theU.K. are up significantly. Did the U.S. miss an opportunity here to show great American design to the seventy million people, mostly Chinese, expected to attend this fair?
I see this as a party—for countries! What’s a party for? It doesn’t have fully defined outcomes. But we know that it’s enriching, breaks routine, and broadens life. It’s an excuse to do something that would otherwise not happen. So I think it’s important that countries take that approach with themselves as well. I think people admire courage. Push forward—don’t be a caricature of your country.
Governments are known for being terrified, and governments are known for being the worst clients. And I feel very proud that scared British government hung in there and did a project that maybe wasn’t the most obvious way to have done it.
In that context—it’s not just that it’s nice to patronize architecture. It’s essential to focus on progress. The public are hungry for the world to keep moving! And culture to keep shifting! Our job as designers is to change people’s perceptions.
You have said, ‘Architecture can make the world a better place.’ How does your Seed Cathedral do that?
I can’t say that. I can’t say that my seed cathedral makes the world a better place. But if someone’s there saying, ‘Mummy, why?’ I’m pleased.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Call for Papers. DMACH 2011 Digital Media and its Applications in Cultural Heritage

Jordan River
Extended Deadline for Paper Submission
September 15, 2010
http://www.csaar-center.org/conference/DMACH2011/ 
Call for Papers
DMACH 2011
Digital Media and its Applications in Cultural Heritage
Organized by
The Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region, Jordan
Al-Turath Foundation, Saudi Arabia
In collaboration with
Queen Rania Institute of Tourism and Heritage, Hashemite University

16-17 March, 2011
Amman -Jordan
 Introduction 
Over the past few years, a remarkable increase has occurred in the use of digital techniques for the documentation, management, and communication of cultural heritage. This has drastically transformed the way we capture, store, process, represent and disseminate information. The techniques employed have evolved from standard surveying and CAD tools and/or traditional photogrammetry into laser scanning virtual reality and fully automated video-based techniques. However, it is often argued that digital media tend to create and compile value-free content and thus are inefficient in capturing and communicating cultural and symbolic meanings. Digital media, as any other medium, tend to amplify or reduce the cultural phenomena as a result of their constraints and limitations. Thus the issue of using digital media for cultural heritage is by no means a simple one and must be examined from different angles. The aim of DMACH2011 is to explore the opportunities and challenges of using 
digital media in the research, preservation, management, interpretation, and representation of cultural heritage. Of particular interest for this year conference are issues related to interactive virtual reality, intelligent and wireless hand-held devices, high speed multi-media, and making virtual reality and augmented reality user-friendly and available resources for the general public.
Building on the successful DMACH 2008 international conference held in Amman, Jordan in 2008 and in order to explore and map the challenges and opportunities of using digital media in cultural heritage, The Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region (CSAAR), Al-Turath Foundation, and Queen Rania Institute of Tourism and Heritage have joined together to organize the second edition of the International Conference on Digital Media and its Applications in Cultural Heritage (DMACH 2011). This conference provides a forum to examine and discuss current practices and future directions in the documentation, representation, and communication of cultural heritage using digital technologies. The conference aims to provide the participants an occasion to share and exchange experiences and research findings, to stimulate more ideas and useful insights regarding the uses of digital media in cultural heritage, and to debate their views on future research and developments.

Topics of Interest
We invite scholars and practitioners in architecture, planning, archaeology, and related fields, as well as administrators of museums, galleries, and archives, to submit papers on any topic related to conference theme. Papers may reflect on a wide spectrum of issues related to digital heritage. The conference is structured around a number of sub-themes that include -but are not limited to:
Virtual realty applications in conservation research and practice
Internet-based applications
E-libraries and e-learning in cultural heritage
Intelligent description of cultural heritage content
Interactive, virtual and augmented environments
wireless hand-held devices
Knowledge systems for heritage management
GIS and spatial information management in cultural heritage
Photogrammetry, laser scanning and scene modeling
Virtual Heritage
Virtual Museums
Data acquisition technologies
3D data capture and processing in cultural heritage
Digital reconstructions and 3D modeling
Reproduction techniques and rapid prototyping in cultural heritage
Multimedia, data management and archiving
Rendering techniques for cultural heritage: photorealistic and non-photorealistic
Innovative graphics applications and techniques
Digital media and commodification of cultural heritage
Authenticity and integrity of data/content
The economics of cultural informatics
Usability and interface design for cultural heritage applications
Methods of and issues related to accessibility and interoperability

Important Dates
Full paper submission for review: September 15, 2010
Notification of acceptance: October 30, 2010
Deadline for final papers: December 15, 2010

Submission and Relevant Information
Abstract submission must be in English with a length of max. 500 words. Full paper submission could be in either English or Arabic. You are asked to identify the research track for your paper.

Abstracts should be e-mailed to scientific committee co-chairs (dmach11@csaar-center.org). Full paper submissions are required to be done online through the conference 
Website: http://www.csaar-center.org/conference/DMACH2011/openconf/ 
Submissions will be peer reviewed.

Full paper format, submission guidelines, registration, accommodation and further information are available at the conference website: http://www.csaar-center.org/conference/DMACH2011/


For further information about submissions, please contact conference secretariat.

Posters, Panel Discussion & Workshops
The conference also welcomes proposals for:
* Poster papers
* Plenary Session/ Panel Discussion
* Workshops
For more details check conference website. 

Conference Proceedings
All papers accepted for publication will be published inthe conference proceedings, which will be available to delegates at the time of registration. In addition, papers will be published in a volume of CSAAR Transactions on the Built Environment (ISSN 1992-7320). 

Best Paper Award (3 Awards)
The Best Paper Award is presented to the individual(s) judged by a separate awards committee to have written the best paper appearing in DMACH & CSAAR conference proceedings. The Award shall be 300 USD and a certificate. In case there is more than one author for the paper, the award shall be divided equally among all authors and each shall receive a certificate. Judging shall be on the bases of general quality, originality, subject matter, and timeliness.  
Scientific Committee Co-Chairs
Jamal Al-Qawasmi
KFUPM, Saudi Arabia
jamal@csaar-center.org
Yahya Alshawabkeh
Hashemite University, Jordan
yahya.alshawabkeh@hu.edu.jo
Fabio Remondino
Bruno Kessler Foundation - FBK, Italy
remondino@fbk.eu
Conference Secretariat
Sami Kamal
sami@csaar-center.org

Experiencia en Moscú para simular la posible convivencia en Marte

Simulador Mars 500. Foto bajada de La Nación
Siempre me pregunté si la colonización a Marte sería como la ha imaginado Ray Bradbury. Y fundamentalmente, cómo sería la convivencia de los grupos en un nuevo habitat, tal vez aislados de sus familiares o sus entornos conocidos. Convivirán en paz las distintas razas? Para imaginarlo, basta leer el cuento de Ray donde unos pobladores racistas se asombran y desesperan por la migración negra a Marte, que avanzan por las calles para acceder a su cohete ¨como ríos negros¨. Más allá de nuestras elucubraciones, no cabe duda que el aislamiento produciría problemas psicológicos. El programa Mars 500, consiste en aislar 6 voluntarios elegidos entre 3000 postulantes,  en una "cápsula" especialmente construida en Moscú, -en un instituto de la Academia de Ciencias de Rusia., por 17 meses, que sería equivalente al tiempo del viaje a Marte.
Los participantes, han sido capacitados para llevar sus registros de comportamiento social. Y cuál será el alivio psicológico? La realidad virtual. 
Programa Mars 500. Foto bajada de La Nación
¨El sistema Earth of Wellbeing de realidad virtual y tecnología web que diseñó el equipo del LabPsiTec y Labhuman promueve las emociones positivas y regula el estado anímico. "Las condiciones de aislamiento podrían propiciar la aparición de reacciones afectivas disfuncionales y un deterioro del estado de ánimo, así como alteraciones cognitivas, motoras y perceptuales, que podrían influir en el comportamiento individual y la interacción entre los miembros del equipo -sostienen los investigadores-. Ahora bien, esas reacciones pueden tener un impacto negativo en el resultado final de la misión."
El sistema les permite a los voluntarios "escapar" mediante la realidad virtual a la serenidad de un parque en medio de una ciudad o un bosque con un lago. Durante 30 minutos, esos entornos virtuales proporcionan calma, relajación y alegría.
"Pueden salir virtualmente a un ambiente abierto diseñado con procedimientos de inducción emocional. Cuando quieren (....)-, ellos pueden ir a esos ambientes virtuales. La literatura indica que las emociones positivas son un antídoto eficaz para luchar contra la depresión, la tristeza, la rabia y el enfado."
Tendremos que esperar los resultados entonces para hacer proyecciones del futuro habitat de Marte.
REFERENCIA

Aislados en un viaje a Marte simulado. Artículo publicado en la Nación, suplemento Ciencia y Salud. 21 de agosto de 2010.

Friday, August 20, 2010

The controversy about Louis Kahn´s sinagogue´s expansion

Picture from Architectural Record
From the article by C.J. Huges, for Architectural Record:
A plan to enlarge the only surviving synagogue by Louis Kahn has sparked opposition among some preservationists, who call the alterations insensitive.
Completed in 1972, the 20,000-square-foot spruce-and-concrete home of Temple Beth El of Northern Westchester, in Chappaqua, New York, was intended to host services and classes for 400 families. But in recent years the congregation had swelled to more than 700 families, meaning it needed more space, says senior rabbi Joshua M. Davidson.
Picture from Architectural Record
To alleviate crowding, the synagogue proposed nearly doubling its size with a 23,000-square-foot U-shaped wing by architect Alexander Gorlin, to contain classrooms, which are currently located in the existing building, and an event space. A groundbreaking occurred in May, and the $12 million project is expected to be finished by next summer.
With three low-slung, single-sloped-roof sections framing a courtyard, the wing is meant to evoke European villages like those in Estonia, where Kahn was born, Davidson says. In fact, many consider the existing synagogue’s eight-sided sanctuary to be inspired by those in Kahn’s native land.
But the most controversial part of the plan is what’s already happened: the demolition of the synagogue’s boxy entryway to make way for a wider, taller version, which took place last week.
For opponents, who include architects and Kahn’s son, Nathaniel, a filmmaker, that effort to make access easier ruins a special aspect of the synagogue and a hallmark of Kahn’s works.
“He purposefully made it hard to enter his buildings, to draw distinctions between where you were and where you were going,” says Bill Whitaker, an architect who has curated the Kahn collection at the University of Pennsylvania for 17 years.
But the synagogue is far from a perfect creation, says New York-based Gorlin, who taught courses about Kahn at Yale’s architecture school for a decade.
The main section, which features an airy sanctuary ringed by classrooms, lacks the types of connecting corridors found in similar houses of worship, like Kahn’s First Unitarian Church in Rochester, says Gorlin.
As a result, people have to cut across the sanctuary to get from one classroom to another, “so you could never have two things going on at the same time,” Gorlin says. Plus, he adds, eight of Kahn’s drawings that were discovered in the synagogue’s attic show Kahn intended an adjacent structure to be built on the site.
Still, despite his criticisms, the sanctuary and classrooms won’t be reconfigured; the wooden walls, however, will be refinished. Nothing else is planned for the interiors, according to Gorlin.
While it may be too late to stop the synagogue expansion, opponents at least want care to be taken with the renovation of the walls, says Nathaniel Kahn, whose 2003 film, My Architect, is about his father.
Still, the loss of the entryway is painful, he says, likening it to lopping off the black-and-white introductory portion of the Wizard of Oz. “It would still be entertaining but robbed of its essential meaning,” Kahn says. “You can’t say that you are respecting the original design while taking away a part of it.”
Read the full article:

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Concurso con fotos de vecinos: Imágenes antiguas en la Avenida de Mayo

Foto de Mariana Araujo para La Nación.
"Estas fotos son de la época de mi mamá, así se vestían cuando eran chicos. Ya con eso te digo mi edad", dijo una señora a una de las colaboradoras del Festival de la Luz 2010 que le ofrecía votar por la foto más linda del concurso "Nuestros abuelos inmigrantes".
La señora, que paseaba ayer por la tarde por la Avenida de Mayo casi Perú, estaba parada frente a una foto que, como si se tratara de una prenda que se seca al sol, colgaba de un piolín sujetada con broches en la vereda del Palacio de Gobierno porteño.
Como ésa, otras cerca de 70 fotografías antiguas pendían de ese piolín. La iniciativa, que sorprendió gratamente a los que pasaron ayer entre las 11 y las 16 por esa vereda, fue una de las intervenciones urbanas del Festival de la Luz 2010, organizado por la Fundación Luz Austral y el gobierno porteño, y que mantuvo el tema de la edición de este año "Migraciones. Identidades en tránsito".
Unas mil doscientas personas, que transitaron por allí, miraron las fotos llevadas por vecinos y alumnos de la Escuela Argentina de Fotografía y dejaron su voto. Al finalizar la actividad, luego del debido escrutinio, se asignó el primer premio -un curso de fotografía- a Wanda Heras por la foto de sus bisabuelos que vinieron de Alemania en la época de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. "Me gustó la foto porque se los ve divertidos y que se aman", dijo a LA NACION la propietaria de la foto, en la que se ve a una pareja dentro de una bañera jugando a los dados y tomando vino y Bidú-Cola.
"Vine a la Casa de la Cultura y me sorprendió gratamente encontrar esta iniciativa, de la que no sabía nada, aun cuando soy estudiante de fotografía", dijo Sonia Sanglar, docente jubilada. "Lo bueno es que me llevo el programa y podré participar de otras actividades", concluyó, y se fue sin saber que con su voto ayudó a obtener el segundo premio -una cámara de fotos- al dueño de una imagen tomada en un estudio alemán, en la que se ve a una institutriz con tres niños y dos perros.
"Lo que buscamos con estas intervenciones urbanas es acercar el arte con la gente común que, generalmente, no va a galerías o museos", planteó el coordinador de estas actividades, Mariano Manikis. Otras intervenciones, durante este mes, son las gigantografías exhibidas en las plazas Dorrego, San Martín, y Perú.
El Festival de la Luz seguirá hasta el 30 de septiembre y su programa completo se puede consultar en wwww.encuentrosabiertos.com.ar .
REFERENCIA
Artículo de Silvia Premat para La Nación. Sección Cultura. 18 de agosto 2010

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails