Arch. Myriam B. Mahiques Curriculum Vitae

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

On the appreciation of arts

Tintoretto. The Annunciation. From http://www.artunframed.com/
Any architect knows how difficult it is when we like a particular style and our clients want something different. I learnt to respect opinions on aesthetic, and carefully explain to them if something was wrong, from a professional point of view. I came upon with some nice words, from my book ¨Arguing about Art¨, in the article of Allen Carlson, page 155. They made me reflect there are different ways to consider buildings.
¨With art objects there is a straightforward sense in which we know both what and how to aesthetically appreciate. We know what to appreciate in that, first, we can distinguish a work and its parts from that which is not it nor a part of it. And, second, we can distinguish its aesthetically relevant aspects from its aspects without such relevance. We know that we are to appreciate the sound of the piano in the concert hail and not the coughing which interrupts it; we know that we are to appreciate that a painting is graceful, but not that it happens to hang in the Louvre. In a similar vein, we know how to appreciate in what ¨acts of aspection¨ to perform in regard to different works. Ziff says:
Hell. Hieronymus Bosch. From http://mapscroll.blogspot.com/
...to contemplate a painting is to perform one act of aspection; to scan it is to perform another; to study, observe, survey, inspect, examine, scrutinise, etc., are still other acts of aspection.
....I survey a Tintoretto, while I scan an H. Bosch. Thus I step back to look at the Tintoretto, up to look a the Bosch. Differente actions are involved. Do you drink brandy in the way you drink beer?
It is clear that we have such knowledge of what and how to aesthetically appreciate.¨

Monday, August 30, 2010

Tea houses in Silicon Valley. By Swatt-Miers archs.

A couple of months ago, I posted about huts, tea houses and environment. But always thinking on tradition. Here is the link for this post:
Now, I´ve come up with an article in Architectural Record Construction that explains the idea for 3 modern tea houses in Silicon Valley. Here, the its reproduction, with some pictures from the same site:

The idea for the tea houses originated years ago, when the owner and his young daughter explored the remote hills surrounding their Silicon Valley home and discovered an idyllic setting below a ridge, under a grove of large California Live Oak trees. At first, the family thought the setting would be perfect for a tree house. Years later, after the 6.000-square-foot main house was extensively remodeled, the vision was realized as three individual tea houses—places where one could simply retreat into nature.
Design concept and solution: Each tea house is designed as a transparent steel and glass pavilion, hovering like a lantern over the natural landscape. Cast-in-place concrete core elements anchor the pavilions, supporting steel channel rim joists, which cantilever beyond the cores to support the floor and roof planes. With its minimal footprint, the design treads lightly on the land, minimizing grading and preserving the delicate root systems of the native oaks.
The three tea houses vary in size, each with its own unique purpose. The 270-square-foot ‘meditation’ tea house, nestled under the canopy of the largest oak tree, is a place for individual contemplation. The slightly larger ‘sleeping’ tea house, approximately 372 square feet, is a place designed for overnight stays. This structure is joined by a sky-lit bathroom core, which bridges to the largest tea house. At 492 square feet, the ‘visioning’ tea house is for intimate gatherings and creative thinking. The notion of ‘quiet simplicity’ is a consistent theme throughout – there are no phones, televisions or audio systems within these structures.
The design emphasizes sustainability. Steel framed doors and awning windows provide access and ventilation, while custom-modified aluminum sliding doors with custom steel interlockers and fixed glass panels, mitered at the corners, dissolve the barrier between inside and outside. Natural cooling is enhanced by shading from strategically placed landscaping, including evergreen redwood trees and bamboo, and deciduous maple and gingko trees. Heating is provided by a radiant hydronic system below the flooring. Electricity is produced on-site by a photovoltaic array mounted on the roof of the main house.
The interiors are executed with a simple palette of contrasting materials—crisply detailed steel and glass, and more ‘organic’ unfinished concrete, board formed and wire brushed to expose the wood grain, as well as cedar boards, recycled from the remodeling of the main house.
As the sunlight and shadows move across the hillside the tea houses take on different forms—at sunrise, the structures disappear into the long shadows; the soft silhouette of the midday sun casts dramatic reflections off the glass; and by evening, the structures glow like lanterns in a garden. Viewed from afar or viewed from within, the tea houses appear at one with their sites, inextricably connected to the native California landscape.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Venecia inaugura su 12.ª Bienal

ORIENTE. Atelier Bow-Wow + Tokyo Institute Of Technology Tsukamoto Lab. Nora House Sendai, Japón.
People meet in Architecture. La gente se encuentra en la arquitectura. Bajo este lema, Venecia inauguró ayer su duodécima Bienal de Arquitectura, que tiene por comisaria a la japonesa Kazuyo Sejima. No es por tanto de extrañar que la segunda instalación de la gran exposición de este certamen sea un filme del alemán Wim Wenders, de 12 minutos de duración, que nos propone un recorrido por el nuevo edificio del Politécnico de Lausana, obra precisamente de Sanaa, el estudio de Sejima/Nishizawa. Esto podría interpretarse como una indecorosa autocita. Pero cabe también una interpretación más amable, paradigmática. Porque el mencionado edificio del equipo japonés, inaugurado hace unos pocos meses para reunir las bibliotecas de la citada universidad suiza, es una estructura de hormigón ondulante que parece conducir a cualquiera de sus usuarios al encuentro con sus congéneres: un singular y afortunado ejemplo de edificio continuo hecho para la interrelación y la convivencia.
Ahora bien, la mayoría de los equipos invitados a Venecia han interpretado el lema de la convocatoria a su manera, de un modo menos textual. Siguen algunos ejemplos (no todos) de lo que depara esta muestra.
'La" instalación. El artista danés Olafur Eliasson firma la instalación más poderosa de este recorrido. En una sala oscura –se corre el peligro de encontrarse con otra gente, sin querer, de un topetazo–, y entre ocho robustas columnas de ladrillo visto rematadas por capitel dórico, cuelgan tres mangueras descontroladas, de las que mana un flujo de agua progresivamente atomizado. Unos focos estroboscópicos congelan las imágenes del líquido que se precipita, logrando estampas de gran plasticidad. Eliasson explica que esa sucesión de imágenes encadenadas, pero separadas, es una alusión a la relación entre el pasado y el presente.
Lo más poético. Más poética, pero no por ello menos efectiva, es la instalación de los ingenieros de Transsolar y del equipo de arquitectos de Tetsuo Kondo, una asociación germano-japonesa que rinde homenaje a las nubes, por su labor como decorado celestial, filtro de rayos solares y proveedor de lluvia. Normalmente, las nubes no son obra de arquitecto, ni lugar de encuentro. Pero los autores de este Cloudscapes han dispuesto una ligera pasarela de hierro, en doble espiral, que permite pasear por el aire y contemplar una nube artificial desde abajo, desde dentro y desde encima, junto a otras personas.
Lo más trabajado. Los arquitectos indios de Studio Mumbai presentan una de las más –si no la más– trabajadas aportaciones del certamen. Aquí el punto de encuentro entre la gente abarca muchas generaciones. Basándose en las técnicas constructivas tradicionales y en un estilo propio enraizado en el Movimiento Moderno, Studio Mumbai despliega una amplísima colección de maquetas propias, de herramientas, piezas y materiales de sobrios y bellísimos colores que consiguen recrear todo un mundo constructivo. La arquitectura no es aquí espacio para la reunión en un lugar, sino en un contínuum temporal en el que los vivos nutren su aportación presente, innovadora, con un viejo acervo cultural.
Lo más sonoro. La artista canadiense Janet Cardiff lleva la idea del encuentro –que no de la arquitectura– a la dimensión sonora, al disponer sobre un perímetro oval cuarenta altavoces enfrentados, cada uno de los cuales emite el sonido de una de las cuarenta voces de un coro, que interpreta una cantata renacentista de Thomas Tallis. Uno se sienta en el centro de este dispositivo acústico y puede experimentar de inmediato lo que es un encuentro sonoro tan vigoroso como bien temperado.
Lo más operístico. También musical, pero esta vez sin sonido, es la propuesta del arquitecto Toyo Ito, afincado en Tokio. Aunque no sea lo más abundante en esta muestra, aquí se nos presenta un proyecto estrictamente arquitectónico. Concretamente, el de la Taichung Metropolitan Opera House, actualmente en construcción, proyecto similar al que ya propuso sin éxito para una sala de conciertos de Gante en el 2004, cuya estructura es como una concatenación de gigantescos galets de hormigón. Algo parecido a una enorme esponja en la que los agujeros fueran mucho más grandes que las partes blandas.
Lo más ligero. Esto es, la estructura de los arquitectos de Amateurs Studio (Hangzhou, China), que con unos cientos de listones, sujetos con simples piezas metálicas, sostienen en el aire una construcción cuyas formas recuerdan a las cúpulas de tantas iglesias, pero con una ligereza muy superior. La arquitectura es aquí un punto de encuentro entre Oriente y Occidente.
Lo mínimo. Sin duda, la casi invisible estructura del arquitecto japonés Junya Ishigami: 24 columnas, dispuestas como en un templo griego, de planta rectangular (14 por 4 metros), pero extremadamente delgadas, de pocos milímetros de grosor, unidas en sus extremos inferior y superior. El colmo del minimalismo. Aquí la gente se encuentra en la arquitectura porque esta, en su inmaterialidad, casi desaparece.
Lo más colosal. El arquitecto madrileño Antón García Abril, único español invitado en los espacios nobles del Arsenal, organiza su intervención alrededor de dos colosales vigas de doble te, cruzadas una sobre otra, en aparente asimetría y equilibro inestable, que rompen la escala del espacio que los alberga (respondiendo, según el autor, a un desafío de la comisaria, Kazuyo Sejima). Esta obra, que viene acompañada de información sobre otros proyectos, se inspira en la Casa Hemeroscopium, el domicilio del autor en Las Rozas.
Otros españoles. Ya fuera de las naves de cordelería y artillería del Arsenal, en sus jardines, concretamente en el espacio ómnibus del Palacio de las Exposiciones, y entre una treintena de propuestas, se cuentan las de otros tres arquitectos españoles. El madrileño Andrés Jaque muestra una especie de nube metálica de la que penden pequeños parasoles, tiburones, flores o chips. Parece una nube plácida. Pero procede de una investigación realizada en un piso de la madrileña calle del Pez, habitado por cuatro jóvenes y decorado con muebles de contenedor. En resumen, un proyecto que intenta convertir una casa cualquiera en una máquina crítica. Por su parte, los también madrileños Cristina Díaz y Efrén García (AMID.cero9) exhiben su Palacio del Cerezo en Flor: una espectacular obra que construyen en el Valle del Jerte; un volumen tirando a amorfo, de 700 metros cuadrados de superficie y revestimiento fractal color cereza, ideado para albergar bailes y fiestas. Las verbenas del siglo XXI ya tienen hogar. A su vez, los arquitectos madrileños José Selgas y Lucía Cano presentan un pequeño laberinto formado por cortinas de plástico transparente rellenadas con restos de materiales y deshechos.
Y además. En el Palacio de las Exposiciones merecen también una visita las propuestas de los portugueses Aires Mateus (cuatro grandes y hermosas superficies blancas, en las que se han excavado o erigido volúmenes arquitectónicos de interior o de exterior); las robustas y expresivas estructuras de madera del suizo Christian Kerez; las maquetas enormes y delicadas preparadas por la oficina de Ryue Nishizawa (en particular la del Teshima Art Museum, ahora en construcción, una especie de gota de agua caída en la cima de la montaña, esencial, con unos óculos por los que se recibe luz cenital y se ve el paisaje); el peculiar homenaje del artista neoyorquino Tom Sachs a Le Corbusier (compara su Ville Savoie, construida alrededor del parking de tres plazas, con un drive-in de McDonalds); o las elucubraciones de Rem Koolhaas (León de Oro de esta Bienal, por el conjunto de su carrera, como Kazuo Shinohara, que ha recibido otro León de Oro) a propósito de proyectos hechos, preservados o destruidos.
Los nacionales. Y, para terminar este apresurado recorrido, una visita a los pabellones nacionales, donde se dan pocas alegrías, debido quizás a la crisis. En el pabellón español, y bajo el título Arquitectura entre límites, se recuperan los proyectos presentados antes del verano al concurso Solar Decatlon Europa, para viviendas alimentadas con energía solar. Japón aborda la transformación de Tokio, mostrandomaquetas dentro de maquetas. Alemania invita a decenas de arquitectos a dibujar sus deseos. Francia recurre a sus estrellas y a enormes audiovisuales para hablar de los problemas de la gran metrópolis. Hungría monta un laberinto con varillas transparentes y lápices. Israel enseña sus kibutz. Y Chequia presenta una estupenda y muy fotogénica instalación construida con incontables listones y tablones de madera... Eso es lo que da de sí el cuerpo central de esta Bienal, que Sejima ha organizado con la intención de "reconsiderar el potencial de la arquitectura en la sociedad contemporánea".
REFERENCIA
Revista de Cultura Eñe. Ambas fotos publicadas en el artículo de revista Eñe.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Call for Papers. ¨Fixed? Architecture, Incompleteness and Change”. UK

The Roland Levinsky Building at the University of Plymouth. Image from http://www.copperconcept.org/referenceshow.asp?rid=824&langid=9
“Fixed? Architecture, Incompleteness and Change”. It is organized by the School of Architecture, Design and Environment, University of Plymouth, UK (Thursday 7 - Friday 8 April 2011)
Are buildings fixed objects? At what point is a work of architecture complete? Architects tend to consider a building as finished, fixed, upon the completion of building works. The unpopulated images of shiny new
buildings in the architectural press are presented as a record of the building as a Œpure¹ art-object at its temporal zenith; the occupation of the building and its subsequent adaptation, alteration, personalization and
appropriation by people is often perceived in terms of decline. ŒFixed?¹ aims to question this view of architecture.
An alternative perspective is that all buildings are incomplete and subject to change over time as the users constantly alter and adapt their surroundings in response to changing cultural and technological conditions.
Architecture is appropriated both intentionally and instinctively. In this way, often beyond the control of the architect, through their lifecycle all architectures become responsive to people and place. In theoretical terms, a work of architecture can therefore be interpreted not only as an ambiguous physical form but also as a shifting, responsive cultural construct.
Thinking about architecture in terms of incompleteness has many possible theoretical roots, for example discourses relating to cultural production, process and the everyday or complexity and transience, but there are also practical precedents within the built environment such as modern vernaculars favelas, shanty towns, retail parks - which are often defined by constant change.
Proposals for both theoretical discussion and case-study based papers are invited that engage with or challenge the theme of incompleteness and change across architecture, design and the built environment. Possible strands include:
- changing, transient and adaptive everyday architectures and modern vernaculars
- the afterlife, use, occupation, adaptation and appropriation of Œfixed¹ designed buildings, spaces and places
- architects responses to the challenge of incompleteness and life-cycle design
Key speakers from a range of practice-based and academic backgrounds include:
Prof. Kingston Heath, University of Oregon
Prof. Hilde Heynen, Katholieke University Leuven, Belgium
Richard Murphy, Richard Murphy Architects, Edinburgh
Dr. Michelangelo Sabatino, University of Houston
Dr. Maiken Umbach, Manchester University
Sarah Wigglesworth, Sarah Wigglesworth Architects, London
“Fixed?” is hosted by the Cultural-Theory-Space Group, University of Plymouth. The convenors are Malcolm Miles, Daniel Maudlin, Robert Brown and Adam Cowley-Evans.

Submission deadline for abstracts: November 30th 2010
Notification: December 20th 2010
Please send abstracts of no more than 300-words and a short CV via email to
Lynne Saunders, School of Architecture, Design and Environment, University of Plymouth: L.C.Saunders@plymouth.ac.uk
For further information on registration details, accommodation in Plymouth
etc, please go to: www.plymouth.ac.uk/fixedconference

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Cartoons in Park Avenue, NY

A rendering of "White Ghost" by Yoshitomo Nara on Park Avenue. The artist will be at the Park Avenue Armory. Picture by Andrea Rojas, posted at NYTimes on line.
The cutesy yet devilish cartoon characters created by the Japanese neo-Pop artist Yoshitomo Nara will soon be familiar sights on the Upper East Side landscape. On Aug. 29 a pair of whimsical, 12-foot-high fiberglass dogs will stand guard like 21st-century Komainu, those mythical lionlike statues commonly placed at the entrance to Japanese shrines to ward off evil spirits.
Organized by the nonprofit Art Production Fund, which presents art around the city, the outdoor installations — one across from the entrance to the Asia Society at 725 Park Avenue, at 70th Street, and the other at 67th Street and Park Avenue just in front of the Park Avenue Armory — will give New Yorkers a hint of a much larger initiative. The Asia Society is presenting a major retrospective of the artist’s work, “Yoshitomo Nara: Nobody’s Fool,” from Sept. 9 through Jan. 2. It will be the first time the entire museum will be filled with the work of just one artist and will include more than 100 works — drawings, paintings, sculptures, record album covers and large installations — that span the 50-year-old Mr. Nara’s career.
But before the retrospective opens, the public will have a chance to see him in action. For three hours daily from Aug. 23 through 27, Mr. Nara will stage his version of an artist’s studio inside the cavernous Drill Hall of the Park Avenue Armory. Visitors can watch him and Hideki Toyoshima, his longtime collaborator on installation designs and a founding member of the Japanese design collective “graf,” as they create special structures that resemble an artist’s studio, a stage and a carnival tent. And with the help of assistants from Japan — working as a team with the artists called YNG — the two will make new drawings and a large-scale billboard painting. Both the structures and the artworks will eventually be moved to the Asia Society as part of the retrospective.
And since the museum is hoping for a particularly young audience, it has also teamed up with students from Hunter College, which is nearby, who will help at the armory and blog about the project on the museum’s Web site. The Asia Society is also developing a special iPhone app for the show that will include exhibition highlights; images from the show linked to related music clips; photographs of past installations in various cities; and an English translation of tweets from narabot, the artist’s Twitter name.
REFERENCE
Cartoons Are Invading the Upper East Side. Article by Carol Vogel, for the New York Times.

Art and morality. A reflection by Arnold Toynbee

Great Pyramid of Egypt. Picture from revelationsofthebible.com
¨When we admire aesthetically the marvellous masonry and architecture of the Great Pyramid or the exquisite furniture and jewellery of Tut-ankh-Amen´s tomb, there is a conflict in our hearts between our pride and pleasure in such triumphs of human art and our moral condemnation of the human price at which these triumphs have been bought: the hard labour unjustly imposed on the many to produce the fine flowers of civilisation for the exclusive enjoyment of a few who reap where they have not sown. During these last five or six thousand years, the masters of the civilisations have robbed their slaves of their share in the fruits of society´s corporate labours as cold-bloodedly as we rob our bees of their honey. The moral ugliness of the unjust acts marks the aesthetic beauty of the artistic results.¨
Arnold Toynbee, Civilisation on Trial. P. 26

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Winner and Selected Works from the Cocktail Napkin Sketch Contest

After being deluged with 1,322 cocktail napkins bearing sketches from 352 architects and architecture students, ARCHITECTURAL RECORD’s jury of editors has determined the winner of its first annual Cocktail Napkin Sketch Contest.
The jury picked as “the best in show” a drawing of a gate from a Japanese garden by Truc Dang Manh Nguyen, an architect from Piedmont, California. The winner has practiced for 27 years and recently opened his own office. He prefers sketching to photographing buildings. “It forces the eye to focus and the mind to work,” he says, “and it’s easier to commit a work of architecture to memory through drawing.” Nguyen found the small size of the 5-inch-square cocktail napkin to be challenging, and confesses that this is the first time he actually tried to sketch on a cocktail napkin.
The jury awarded cocktail napkin sketches that reflect the spontaneous act of creativity underlyling this ephemeral art form. While a number of entrants treated the cocktail napkin sketch as an exercise in more time-consuming rendering, the jurors admired the artistry of these exercises and included several runners-up that belong to this category.
In addition to the winner and six runners-up, the RECORD editors selected additional sketches notable for their drawing techniques.
And finally, these entries caught the editors’ eyes for approaching the contest in ways that were either innovative—or out-and-out bizarre
REFERENCE
http://archrecord.construction.com/features/cocktail_napkin_sketch_contest/

Interview to Thomas Heatherwick, the Seed Cathedral´s creator

The Seed Cathedral representing the United Kingdom, has been the most impressive building in the great Expo Shangai. Here, I reproduce an interview by Edward Lifson to Thomas Heatherwick, its creator from Heatherwick Studio, London. Published in metropolismag.com, August 9th 2010. Photos by Edward Lifson:
Tell me about the project brief—what did the British government want from its pavilion?
We were very conscious of the context in which it was going to sit—the world’s largest-ever Expo. But the brief from the government asked for a building that showed that the U.K. is a good place to live and work, has good governance, and is multicultural and diverse and sustainable. So you’re going slightly numb reading that brief, because you know that that’s exactly the same brief that every other designer of every other pavilion has been given. And the British government added,  ‘And get voted one of the top ten pavilions!’ We felt that if we just did a cheesy advert for Britain, with clichés, we would not achieve that goal. The only way we would be noticed is by being slightly oblique.
We argued very strongly to the British government that instead of trying to say everything about Britain, we needed to try to say one thing well. The Expo theme, ‘Better City, Better Life,’ sounds catchy, sounds maybe too cute? But in a way it’s very serious. What’s the future of cities? What more serious question is there? We felt that we must respond to that. And something that the United Kingdom did pioneer is the integration of nature into cities. The world’s greenest city of its size in the world is actually London. The sheer quantity of parks, private gardens, public squares, private squares—and then we found that the world’s first botanical institution was in the U.K. And arguably one of the first public parks in modern times was in Britain.
So how did that idea about green cities lead to this design?
We tried to find something that would symbolize nature in the city as a starting point for the design. And we found that the Royal Botanical Gardens at Kew have a project to collect and preserve twenty-five percent of all the world’s plant species. We found that many people knew of this in Britain, but no one had actually seen it. The seeds aren’t there to see! We’re used to thinking that seeds are insignificant. So we felt that there’s a symbolic role that the seed could play, having to do with potential. And so we made one simple move. We trapped sixty thousand seeds in the ends of optical tubes that are seven and half meters long.
 What messages does your pavilion send to the Chinese visitors?
One message is that Britain is more than ‘bobbies’ and Big Ben. It’s a magnet for creative people. Many of the most brilliant have chosen to locate in Britain and London in particular. It’s just amazing what’s there. And so the pavilion is there to reflect that and try to change what people think a pavilion might be.
And we didn’t want a building and then a separate design for the exhibits inside. We set ourselves a task to make the building be the contents and make the contents be the building.
So many of the pavilions here are razzle-dazzle—they wow you. And so many of the towers booming in Chinese cities also flash lights and change colors and so forth. Is your pavilion a statement of resistance to that trend in place-making?
At this Expo, in a sea of stimulation, we thought that calmness would actually be the thing that would refresh you and that you might be the most thirsty for.
Then is your ‘Seed Cathedral’ a place of contemplation in which a Chinese visitor could regain their self and remember who they are, in this society speeding ahead at breakneck speed?
We don’t want to preach or patronize. We wanted a place you could interpret in many ways. You might find it technically interesting, or decorative in some way, or anything else. We give it no obvious interpretation.
We called it the ‘Seed Cathedral.’ I fought for that name. ‘Cathedral’ is not meant to imply any religious connotation. It is to evoke an architectural quality of space which is grand.  Maybe grandiose even.
The great Gothic cathedrals with pointed arches are based on trees leaning together. You take it even farther back—to the seed.
And the daylight coming through the tubes and the seeds is slightly like stained glass. It’s quite nice. I didn’t know that that would happen! But we were deliberately playing with the contrast between grandiosity and insignificance, bundling these things together. In a way, the power of the potential in those sixty thousand seeds is mind-blowingly massive. And you’re standing in the middle of the most bio-diverse point you could possibly stand in, in Shanghai! Everything is there, and yet there’s a kind of absence, it’s totally calm. We have even had people say, ‘Where is it? There’s nothing here!’
Have you been to the U.S. pavilion?
Yes.
What do you think of it?
The U.S. pavilion was clearly a last-minute operation. It was clearly done fast. And I think you can tell that it was done fast.
I know potential Chinese clients have come to you since this pavilion opened, and Her Majesty’s Consul General in Shanghai says Chinese visa applications to theU.K. are up significantly. Did the U.S. miss an opportunity here to show great American design to the seventy million people, mostly Chinese, expected to attend this fair?
I see this as a party—for countries! What’s a party for? It doesn’t have fully defined outcomes. But we know that it’s enriching, breaks routine, and broadens life. It’s an excuse to do something that would otherwise not happen. So I think it’s important that countries take that approach with themselves as well. I think people admire courage. Push forward—don’t be a caricature of your country.
Governments are known for being terrified, and governments are known for being the worst clients. And I feel very proud that scared British government hung in there and did a project that maybe wasn’t the most obvious way to have done it.
In that context—it’s not just that it’s nice to patronize architecture. It’s essential to focus on progress. The public are hungry for the world to keep moving! And culture to keep shifting! Our job as designers is to change people’s perceptions.
You have said, ‘Architecture can make the world a better place.’ How does your Seed Cathedral do that?
I can’t say that. I can’t say that my seed cathedral makes the world a better place. But if someone’s there saying, ‘Mummy, why?’ I’m pleased.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails