Aerial picture of Alhambra in the area of 710 freeway.
Another aerial picture of Alhambra, East of previous picture in the residential zone.
Another aerial picture of Alhambra, East of previous picture in the residential zone.
Alhambra is a city inhabited by a majority of Asian and their descendants in America, followed in percentages by Chicano population. In residential areas, the Zoning Code allows to build a lot coverage of 50%, with a FAR of 38%. Supposedly, for a bigger lot, a bigger house could be built.
Legally, for any new house or addition, given the project complies with the Zoning regulations, the final decision of the house square footage will be taken by Planning Commission. The problem here is the criteria and methodology to take this decision.
The process begins with an investigation of the declaration of surfaces of housings, according to the office of the Assessor´s of collection of taxes, in a radius of 300´ around the house in question. Main issue here, in several cases this information is not updated and - obviously - it doesn't include the illegal additions that are also part of the urban fabric and city growth. Once the planners have a list of all square footages in this area, they take an average of this chart and force the homeowner to respect a maximum square footage according to the average of the other houses inside the radius map, regardless the lot size (!).
Nowadays, we have many research tools to analyze the city and have outputs of the best way to avoid urban sprawl. I do not mean to use powerful softwares based on fractal morphology, or land use as GIS (geographical information systems), but at least apply a reasonable criteria.
Let us see an example. If the area selected includes the small houses of workers, annexed to the local 710 freeway, any person with a big lot here, will be absolutely restricted by the average. Continuing with the example, Planning Commission would overlook the fact that these houses were built between the years 1934 and 1939. This type of urban politics stop the neighborhood overall growth. Most probably, these houses will have a record at the Assessor’s with 900–1000 sq ft. That I consider substandard for the current necessities of a modern family, specially if the majority of population in Alhambra is Asian and Chicano, cultures that are grouped by kinship and an average of five people could be living in each house.
A possible action, could be to displace the 300’ radius map. But this is not acceptable, the radius map has to strictly show the house selected in the center. What is an abstract geometrical concept that does not reflect the real urban issues.
The strict numeric analysis does not take into account urban perceptions, habits, morphology, land use, culture of the inhabitants, urban fabric. It is just a number, and citizens are not numbers.
Legally, for any new house or addition, given the project complies with the Zoning regulations, the final decision of the house square footage will be taken by Planning Commission. The problem here is the criteria and methodology to take this decision.
The process begins with an investigation of the declaration of surfaces of housings, according to the office of the Assessor´s of collection of taxes, in a radius of 300´ around the house in question. Main issue here, in several cases this information is not updated and - obviously - it doesn't include the illegal additions that are also part of the urban fabric and city growth. Once the planners have a list of all square footages in this area, they take an average of this chart and force the homeowner to respect a maximum square footage according to the average of the other houses inside the radius map, regardless the lot size (!).
Nowadays, we have many research tools to analyze the city and have outputs of the best way to avoid urban sprawl. I do not mean to use powerful softwares based on fractal morphology, or land use as GIS (geographical information systems), but at least apply a reasonable criteria.
Let us see an example. If the area selected includes the small houses of workers, annexed to the local 710 freeway, any person with a big lot here, will be absolutely restricted by the average. Continuing with the example, Planning Commission would overlook the fact that these houses were built between the years 1934 and 1939. This type of urban politics stop the neighborhood overall growth. Most probably, these houses will have a record at the Assessor’s with 900–1000 sq ft. That I consider substandard for the current necessities of a modern family, specially if the majority of population in Alhambra is Asian and Chicano, cultures that are grouped by kinship and an average of five people could be living in each house.
A possible action, could be to displace the 300’ radius map. But this is not acceptable, the radius map has to strictly show the house selected in the center. What is an abstract geometrical concept that does not reflect the real urban issues.
The strict numeric analysis does not take into account urban perceptions, habits, morphology, land use, culture of the inhabitants, urban fabric. It is just a number, and citizens are not numbers.